From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce439995694047ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.illinois.net!attcg1!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada for dummies needed. Date: 2 Mar 2005 11:18:17 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <877jkrktef.fsf@kafka.homenet> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1109783844 6349 192.135.80.34 (2 Mar 2005 17:17:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8588 Date: 2005-03-02T11:18:17-06:00 List-Id: In article <877jkrktef.fsf@kafka.homenet>, israel writes: > Jeffrey Carter writes: > >> Now if we can just arrange things so dummies are not allowed to make >> language choices or create designs ... > > Easy ! > > Just publish 'Explosives For Dummies' and leave out the safety instructions. > That will improve the human gene pool. > :-) My wife says: Come on, why go to the work of taking out the safety instructions? If they were inclined to read the safety instructions, they wouldn't be called dummies.