From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,15ce5e046cd0b91d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-10 22:21:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: dwparsons@t-online.de (Dave Parsons)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada for OS/2
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:20:30 +0200
Organization: CDL
Message-ID: 
 <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-qk9Oyf4HDXvB@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de>
References: <3B417021.A68938D2@eyup.org>
 <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-EQD7wYBFeq2G@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de>
 <ywLYhRw4zi4W-pn2-STmDwjL1Ko2l@aigh168by26ya.ab.hsia.telus.net>
 <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-7JOd7XW2RPdN@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de>
 <5ee5b646.0108050810.a9b4f91@posting.google.com>
 <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-KWi1r5BLeZzH@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de>
 <5ee5b646.0108071445.1a4056eb@posting.google.com>
 <Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-VwdQdshHPfwc@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de>
 <5ee5b646.0108091023.4aafff84@posting.google.com>
Reply-To: dwparsons@t-online.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 997507230 01 5250 l-3qSTBSSt-doA 010811 05:20:30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 0802493406-0001@t-dialin.net
User-Agent: ProNews/2 V1.51.ib104
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11789
Date: 2001-08-11T07:20:30+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:23:30, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote:
 
> Oh, but you will! That's the point of having the sources at gnu.org,
> contributions of this kind will be welcome. After all if 100% of the
> changes are being done by ACT, there is no point in having the sources
> at gnu.org, the whole point of putting them there is to take advantage
> of volunteer efforts, since, as we see in the OS/2 case, ACT can't
> manage to handle all possible ports, but we will be happy to
> incorporate any OS/2 contributions.

Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I was a bit uncertain about the
relationship between ACT and gnu.org.