From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30f8e9ec3e840189 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-09 14:01:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: dwparsons@t-online.de (Dave Parsons) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: avl tree - booch components Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 23:01:01 +0200 Organization: CDL Message-ID: References: <20010907091153.12625104.tonygair@nospam.blueyonder.co.uk> Reply-To: dwparsons@t-online.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1000069261 02 30136 Z2o0S8-XSt-mmj 010909 21:01:01 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 0802493406-0001@t-dialin.net User-Agent: ProNews/2 V1.51.ib104 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12959 Date: 2001-09-09T23:01:01+02:00 List-Id: On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 18:27:48, Simon Wright wrote: > dwparsons@t-online.de (Dave Parsons) writes: > > > Yes, I compiled all the tests and demos last weekend. I had to turn > > off the style checking though, too many lines too long. > > -gnaty gives errors on 3.13p, I'm used to warnings with 3.14a1. Sorry. > The 'lines too long' are typically the revision control strings, shame > CVS doesn't let you customise what $Id$ gives you .. > > > Only queue_tests_concurrent seemed to have a serious problem. It > > compiled ok but hung near the end. > > Hmm, on Linux it works as expected when run from the makefile but > locks up when run from the command line: ... stranger & stranger, > actually it works *every other time*. More investigation needed. > > > All the others ran ok and the results looked ok except for > > map_test_concurrent, M10G, M11G, M10S & M11S. > > This is correct behaviour, I forgot to update that test; this is the diff > > --- map_test_concurrent.adb 2001/04/14 08:35:27 1.6 > +++ map_test_concurrent.adb 2001/09/09 18:09:38 > @@ -340,13 +340,13 @@ > Assertion (MUS."=" (The_US.Map_U_Pu1, Map_U_Pu3), > "** M09S: Maps are not equal"); > end; > - Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu1) = 297, > + Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu1) = 97, > "** M10G: Available space is not correct"); > - Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu2) = 300, > + Assertion (MBG.Available (The_BG.Map_B_Pu2) = 100, > "** M11G: Available space is not correct"); > - Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu1) = 297, > + Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu1) = 97, > "** M10S: Available space is not correct"); > - Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu2) = 300, > + Assertion (MBS.Available (The_BS.Map_B_Pu2) = 100, > "** M11S: Available space is not correct"); > Put_Line ("Completed map tests"); > > > I've never used the Booch Components before on any platform, so I > > don't know how this compares with other versions. > > > > Comments anyone? > > Thanks for the report. Ok, good, thanks to you also for confirming that this version is working resonably well. I'll update that test and see how it goes. -- Dave