Well that version number was proposed by ACT itself Steph after Jeff first
named it 5.01a ;-).  they talked on the phone and ACT told him he could call
it 5.01p :-)

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:uznfkszm3.fsf@nasa.gov...
> "Jeff C," <nolongersafeto@userealemailsniff.com> writes:
>
> > I had wanted to run ACATS before I released the RPM but I knew I'd
> > never get to it. Do you have similar results for the vanilla gcc
> > 3.3.x series. It would be interesting to see if 5.01p actually
> > performs better.
>
> Can I request that you _not_ call your version of GNAT 5.01p? That's
> the name ACT will use for their public release when they get around to
> it.
>
> Please call yours 5.01j (for Jeff), or something. Adding the date is
> not enough.
>
> -- 
> -- Stephe