From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92ab0b93767eaa5e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-21 14:20:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <3B82CD0B.4A551A42@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> Subject: Re: Comment on Ada usage Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:20:36 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 21:20:36 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12191 Date: 2001-08-21T21:20:36+00:00 List-Id: In article <3B82CD0B.4A551A42@sparc01.ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>, Wes Groleau says... > > >In embedded systems: ADA [sic] is used less than Forth ? >http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20010813S0073 That was a reader survey. In the article he comes right out and says this isn't even close to scientific. He even points out some places where their numbers are horribly at odds with more scientific polls. I'd be more interested in Jerry Petry's opinion of his charactarization of Forth vs. Ada, as he's a fan of both languages (whereas this guy obviously isn't). --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com