From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a50fed7be9d7a90,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nathan A. Barclay" <nbarclay@hiwaay.net>
Subject: Ada Compilers
Date: 1997/11/13
Message-ID: <EYaYJEA88GA.111@newstoo.hiwaay.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 289149772
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>




The project I'm working on at work is looking into switching from Ada 83 to
Ada 95, and I've been trying to get an idea of how the different Ada 95
compilers compare.  Specifically, the compilers we're considering are GNAT
with Ada Core Technologies' support, Aonix's ObjectAda, Green Hills
Software's Ada compiler, and MAYBE Rational Apex Ada (although it's probably
too expensive).  If anyone has any thoughts on how the compilers compare (or
on related questions, e.g. something they especially like or dislike about
one of them), I'd love to hear them.  We're looking specifically at Sun
Sparc/Solaris systems, but thoughts stemming from other platforms might be
useful too, if not to me then maybe to others.