From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d321b3a6b8bcab2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-12 15:18:55 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!seunet!news2.swip.net!celsiustech.se!world.celsiustech.se!ersv
From: ersv@world.celsiustech.se (Erik Svensson)
Subject: Re: "Subtract C, add Ada"
In-Reply-To: bill@valiant's message of 10 Jan 1995 12:31:41 GMT
Message-ID: <ERSV.95Jan12105648@world.celsiustech.se>
Sender: usenet@celsiustech.se
Nntp-Posting-Host: world.celsiustech.se
Organization: CelsiusTech AB
References: <3etund$hnr@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 09:56:47 GMT
Date: 1995-01-12T09:56:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>  3. uninitialised pointer access
>  4. pointer references to local variables in defunct procedures
>The syntax of Ada removes or reduces errors like 1. and 2. but does
>not really address 3. or 4. (admitedly, 4. is an unnatural practice in
>Ada and would be pretty rare anyway).

Since Ada inititalizes (Sp?) all access variables to Null 3, would seem
to be handled as well, or at least easily handled.