From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fcf49159b09a2f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-31 06:34:42 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!blanket.mitre.org!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Using DCE RPC with Ada Date: 31 Oct 94 09:25:47 Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <38m1po$gvm@news.manassas.ibm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: goldfinger.mitre.org In-reply-to: crist@tbirdo.endicott.ibm.com's message of 26 Oct 1994 16:57:28 GMT Date: 1994-10-31T09:25:47+00:00 List-Id: In general, Ada/DCE interfacing is not 'reliable' due to the interactions (and lack thereof) between Ada tasks and DCE threads. Do NOT expect this to be fixed anytime soon. The Ada community worked hard to get the forthcoming POSIX threads standard to be 'Ada Friendly'. We were only partially successful. Once POSIX threads comes out, Ada RTS vendors can work on integrating Ada tasks and POSIX/C threads. In the meantime, strange things can happen... dave -- --The preceeding opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of --The MITRE Corporation or its sponsors. -- "A good plan violently executed -NOW- is better than a perfect plan -- next week" George Patton -- "Any damn fool can write a plan. It's the execution that gets you -- all screwed up" James Hollingsworth -------------------------------------------------------------------------