From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,df52cf364e9edc0a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-12 13:32:49 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!eff!blanket.mitre.org!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@goldfinger.mitre.org (David Emery) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is DoD simulation ignoring using Ada????? Date: 12 Dec 94 15:31:22 Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Message-ID: References: <3c5e6t$3l9@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> <3c8hm9$edq@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <3chn2q$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: goldfinger.mitre.org In-reply-to: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com's message of 12 Dec 1994 14:35:06 GMT Date: 1994-12-12T15:31:22+00:00 List-Id: >LCSS - Life Cycle Software Support. (Surely everyone who claims to work in the >Ada world knows LCSS! ;) Why??? LCSS is a DoD-unique (actually, Air Force-unique, I suspect) acronym. It is explicitly NOT the case that everyone using Ada is doing so on a DoD project. dave -- --The preceeding opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of --The MITRE Corporation or its sponsors. -- "A good plan violently executed -NOW- is better than a perfect plan -- next week" George Patton -- "Any damn fool can write a plan. It's the execution that gets you -- all screwed up" James Hollingsworth -------------------------------------------------------------------------