From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,bf2f30a0886f0d6c X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,bf2f30a0886f0d6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-24 16:15:42 PST Xref: sparky comp.lang.ada:4790 comp.lang.misc:4476 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.misc Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@dr_no.mitre.org (David Emery) Subject: Re: Classes vs Tagged Types - Terminology In-Reply-To: nebbe@lglsun.epfl.ch's message of 24 Mar 93 08:58:57 GMT Message-ID: Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: dr-no.mitre.org Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. References: <1993Mar24.094530@lglsun.epfl.ch> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1993 00:15:42 GMT Date: 1993-03-25T00:15:42+00:00 List-Id: >Tagged types will probably be a peculiarity of Ada (although certainly >justified in Ada's case) and I don't think we will be seeing other >languages with tagged types. Modula-3, if I'm not mistaken, uses the same idea as Ada 9X... dave