From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52d2ab9c3dfbc246 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-12 08:29:19 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@dr_no.mitre.org (David Emery) Subject: Re: Ada scandal makes front page of Wash. Post business section In-Reply-To: news@fedfil.UUCP's message of 10 Mar 93 22:38:41 GMT Message-ID: Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: dr-no.mitre.org Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. References: <335@fedfil.UUCP> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 15:15:48 GMT Date: 1993-03-12T15:15:48+00:00 List-Id: One of the interesting things we've noticed over the last few years as our contractors started using Ada is that it's easier to spot disasters. It used to be that we wouldn't discover that a program was totally screwed up until close to delivery. Now, we can tell pretty early into the program when it won't make it. We still don't know what to do about it, but at least the problems become visible earlier. In many respects, Ada is to "blame" for this, because Ada makes it easier to see the design, or lack of design, in the software. This isn't just a feature of Ada, but Ada helps significantly. The morale of the story is that bad programmers can screw up using any language. Ada just makes this more visible. dave