From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 22 Feb 93 18:22:16 GMT
From: emery@mitre-bedford.arpa  (David Emery)
Subject: Re: Does DECada 1.1 really use POSIX 1003 draft 4 threads...
Message-ID: <EMERY.93Feb22132216@goldfinger.mitre.org>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

These POSIX blocking behaviors are defined in P1003.5, and are
independent of the use of POSIX.4a threads.  (They can be supported
via threads, or any other implementation technique.)  

This doesn't answer the basic question, which is "Does DECAda1.1 use
POSIX threads?"  

Also, I'd like to remind everyone, once again, that P1003.4a Threads
Extension to POSIX is *NOT* an approved standard, and is still a fair
distance from standardization.  People should use/interpret/read draft
standards with a large grain of salt.

				dave