From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!caen!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!linus!linus!linus!mbunix!emery From: emery@Dr_No.mitre.org (David Emery) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: You get what you pay for (not true in software) Message-ID: Date: 20 Jun 91 19:56:20 GMT References: <"13-Jun-91.14:53:27.EDT".*.Martin_A._Leisner.Henr801C@Xerox.com> <2356@raybed2.msd.ray.com> Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. In-Reply-To: rgc@raybed2.msd.ray.com's message of 20 Jun 91 13:50:29 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: dr_no.mitre.org List-Id: Probably the greatest benefit from the ALS and AIE government-funded Ada compiler contracts is the large number of people who worked at SofTech and Intermetrics, and then went on to build a second (successful) Ada compiler (usually somewhere else). This is a side of Ada technology transfer that has not been adequately recognized and acknowledged as part of an Ada success story. dave emery