From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!agate!linus!linus!emery
From: emery@linus.mitre.org (David Emery)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Postscript formatter for Ada?
Message-ID: <EMERY.90Oct10140638@aries.linus.mitre.org>
Date: 10 Oct 90 18:06:38 GMT
References: <14674@hydra.gatech.EDU> <8932@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Sender: usenet@linus.mitre.org
Distribution: na
Organization: The Mitre Corporation, Bedford, MA
In-reply-to: ssdtom@conan.Claremont.EDU's message of 8 Oct 90 17:38:05 GMT
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>From: ssdtom@conan.Claremont.EDU (Tom Radi)
>The ADADL processor (commercially available, and with SIGNIFICANT
>educational discounts) performs a pretty printing of Ada code, 
>as well as providing cross reference information etc.

Is anyone else getting tired of reading these advertisments?  It seems
like every time someone asks a tool question, someone posts a message
about how ADADL solves that problem (and all others, too).  

How about a semi-policy: Please respond to such requests via email
direct to the requestor, and let him summarize.  Let's try to keep the
commercial appeals down...

				dave emery
				emery@aries.mitre.org