From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a2c7f6cbdb72aa16 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: "proprietary", was Re: ada on linux Date: 2000/06/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 631505354 References: <8hg755$t95$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 960247908 207.214.211.176 (Mon, 05 Jun 2000 16:31:48 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 16:31:48 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >The trouble with freeBSD, is there is nothing to stop R. Dewar > or anyone else making nonfreeveryexpensiveproprietaryBSD with > some small changes. That you find this perfectly acceptable is not the issue - your belief that this is the only reason people object to the GPL, is incorrect.