From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee6065fc75bfcb4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Overlaying of methods.
Date: 1997/10/01
Message-ID: <EHCLM6.Csy@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 276897115
References: <34310F93.41C6@htl-bw.ch>
 <JSA.97Sep30175102@alexandria.organon.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <JSA.97Sep30175102@alexandria.organon.com>,
Jon S Anthony <jsa@alexandria.organon.com> wrote:
>Off the top of my head, the call looks like it should give a compile
>time ambiguous overload resolution error.  If this isn't true, could
>Robert, Bob or Tucker explain why it is OK?

Maybe Init is being called from a place where only one of the two Init's
is visible?  I'd have to see the complete code to be sure what's going
on here.

- Bob