From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5476b3d054787453 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) Subject: Re: Ada95 and RTOS Date: 1997/09/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 276412480 Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: houdini.camb.inmet.com References: <342D49FF.2D98@mx3.redestb.es> Organization: Intermetrics, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: juan carlos diaz martin (jdiaz@mx3.redestb.es) wrote: : Do I need a Real Time Operating System -such as POSIX.4- under Ada95 in : order Ada95 programs using the Real Time Anex behave in the predecible : way the programmer expect? Or Posix.1 + Ada95 is enough? : Comments and bibliografic references would br appreciated. The compiler vendor has to validate using a combination of a compiler and a run-time system. You shouldn't need to select your own RTOS, and you probably can't expect a given Ada compiler to integrate direclty with an arbitrary RTOS. Instead, you should select which validated compiler/RTOS combination meets your needs, by surveying the Ada 95 compiler vendors who support the RT annex (alphabetically: ACT, Aonix, Concurrent, DDC-I, Green Hills, ICS, OCS, Rational, RR, TLD, ...). -- -Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/ Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA