From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
From: nospam@thanks.com.au (Don Harrison)
Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract)
Date: 1997/09/12
Message-ID: <EGDt5y.42v@syd.csa.com.au>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 271836456
Sender: news@syd.csa.com.au
References: <mheaney-ya023680001009970904100001@news.ni.net>
Reply-To: nospam@thanks.com.au
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dev50
Organization: CSC Australia, Sydney
Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Matt Heaney wrote:

:>..  One typical coding style adopted
:>for Ada package bodies is:
:>
:>     <declarations of local subprograms>
:>
:>     <bodies for visible subprograms>
:>
:>     <bodies for local subprograms>
:>
:>Given this style, the bodies can be ordered in any way that is convenient.
:
:Funny, I didn't understand Don's comment, because I thought that everyone
:already did this.

There you go. You learn something new every day. :)

Looks like there are people out there who actually think they shouldn't have 
to repeat themselves! :)


Don.                     (Reverse to reply)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Don Harrison             au.com.csa.syd@donh