From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Design By Contract
Date: 1997/09/09
Message-ID: <EG9Eo4.318@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 271130658
References: <JSA.97Sep3201329@alexandria.organon.com>
 <EFz0pD.E6n@syd.csa.com.au> <JSA.97Sep4172912@alexandria.organon.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>In article <EFz0pD.E6n@syd.csa.com.au> nospam@thanks.com.au (Don Harrison) writes:
>
>> I know you'll probably disagree, (and this is getting into Matt
>> Heaney territory), but I believe simplicity is innately,
>> universally, and uniformly recognisable by everyone. ...

Then how come not everyone in this thread seems to agree on what's
simpler than what?

- Bob