From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8a68738f40c40821
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Recursive Protected types getting deadlocked! (longish)
Date: 1997/09/08
Message-ID: <EG7Kpx.I2G@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 270855335
References: <5uu4mr$6fs$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5uu4mr$6fs$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>,
Dale Stanbrough  <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> wrote:
>I've written a small semaphore that records the task id of the owner,
>allowing recusive lock taking (i'm looking at how Java tasking works).

I didn't look at all your code, but I think you've violated C.7.1(17).

- Bob