From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f3f9104dada53163 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Subject: Re: An interesting quote on Java and C++ Date: 1997/09/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270860543 References: <5ujjvq$t4s@drn.zippo.com> <01bcb881$915526a0$d7000064@sim01.amst.co.at> Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <01bcb881$915526a0$d7000064@sim01.amst.co.at>, Joachim Schroeer wrote: >Possibly the Java designers never heard of Ada, otherwise they did not have >to invent a new language. Surely you're not saying that Ada (as is) meets the goals of Java? >Stroustrup said, that a reason why they developed C++ was, "we >did not want to program in C". There are other ways to prevent that ... Indeed. - Bob