From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle) Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract) Date: 1997/09/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270147673 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: skule.ecf Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator) References: <340C85CE.6F42@link.com> <340F3801.47E5@pseserv3.fw.hac.com> Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jon S Anthony wrote: > > >> > , often due to compilation dependencies. IMO, there's no excuse >> > for imposing dependency-related >ordering in an age of multi-pass >> > compilation. > >And this is just plain wrong. Any particular reason why you feel the >need to go around spouting obvious falsehoods? Also, multi-pass >compilation has existed for over 30 years (probably longer) so this is >just plain irrelevant. So you think there exists a reason to impose dependency-related ordering? >These two bits end up making you look completely clueless... Boy, Jon, we really could have done without this wisecrack. -PD -- -- Patrick Doyle doylep@ecf.utoronto.ca