From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: nospam@thanks.com.au (Don Harrison) Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract) Date: 1997/09/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 269327074 Sender: news@syd.csa.com.au References: <3406A707.787D@dmu.ac.uk> Reply-To: nospam@thanks.com.au X-Nntp-Posting-Host: dev50 Organization: CSC Australia, Sydney Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Graham Perkins wrote: :Tucker Taft wrote: :> In my experience, separating the spec and body physically is :> extremely advantageous, and the need to have redundancy between : :Personally I prefer the single file approach as with Eiffel.. Thought you might. :) :But really, this whole discussion indicates to me that we are still in :the stone age with our tools.. [lots of good stuff about how a software repository ought to work] :Now where is that repository with all that power I want ... : [if you're setting up a team to develop such a beast, please : count me in] .. and me! :) :maybe Eiffel vendors are further down that road than many (or Unisys UREP might :be the right track to follow) but we still seem a long way from open repositories :than support full process Agree. Don. (Reverse to reply) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Don Harrison au.com.csa.syd@donh