From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle)
Subject: Re: Design By Contract
Date: 1997/09/01
Message-ID: <EFtD97.Mrn@ecf.toronto.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 269339875
Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
References: <JSA.97Aug28172900@alexandria.organon.com>
 <JSA.97Aug29150908@alexandria.organon.com> <EFqE8L.4Eq@ecf.toronto.edu>
 <JSA.97Aug30145058@alexandria.organon.com>
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: skule.ecf
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <JSA.97Aug30145058@alexandria.organon.com>,
Jon S Anthony <jsa@alexandria.organon.com> wrote:
>
>Generally speaking, opinion (mine included) is irrelevant and just
>leads to the complete waste of bandwidth these sorts of silly threads
>suck up.

  Ok, if you want to turn this place into an online technical
manual, fine.  I think I'll keep reading others' opinions ("irrelevant"
and "waste of bandwidth" as they may be) just in case I might
actually learn something.

 -PD

-- 
--
Patrick Doyle
doylep@ecf.utoronto.ca