From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,8ff80a74f45b5cd3 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ff80a74f45b5cd3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle) Subject: Re: Visibility and access to "public" attributes Date: 1997/09/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 269338311 Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator) References: <872873007.3110@dejanews.com> X-Nntp-Posting-Host: skule.ecf Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jon S Anthony wrote: >In article doylep@ecf.toronto.edu (Patrick Doyle) writes: > >> I've changed the name and type of the attribute, and the public >> interface has remained the same. >> >> If this isn't what you were talking about, could you explain? > >No it is not - you didn't change the name. A is still called "A", but >I don't believe that such a situation (literally changing the name) is >something that is likely to be even a small deal in practice. Ok, I misunderstood. Can you show me what you meant in Ada code? -PD -- -- Patrick Doyle doylep@ecf.utoronto.ca