From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec14cedca2cdf8ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Why isn't this ambiguous?
Date: 1997/08/04
Message-ID: <EEEIH4.JAJ@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 262329007
References: <dewar.870556483@merv> <199708041340.PAA25417@basement.replay.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-08-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <199708041340.PAA25417@basement.replay.com>,
Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM> wrote:
>I expected the calls to Image to be ambiguous, but GNAT has chosen the
>one that returns Character. Anyone able to provide insight?

I agree that it's ambiguous.

- Bob