From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2507b6d982782e45
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: [Q] Problem with Array Concatenation?
Date: 1997/07/13
Message-ID: <ED8nwr.J7v@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 256533292
References: <mheaney-ya023680001007971857360001@news.ni.net>
 <ED611s.5yM.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <ED611s.5yM.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
>Matthew Heaney (mheaney@ni.net) wrote:
>: ...
>: There's another way to make the fix, by manually sliding the initial substring:
>
>: declare
>:    type AT is array (Positive range 1 .. 100) of Integer;
>
>:    SA : AT;
>:    DA : AT;
>:    subtype Slided is AT (1 .. 50);
>
>Now *this* is not legal Ada (83 or 95).  You can't re-constrain
>a constrained array (sub)type.

Heh, heh.  You can't call a type "AT", because that's a reserved word.
;-)  (And, as Tucker points out, it ain't legal English, either --
"slided" ain't a word.)

- Bob