From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9bf6617358567a9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-08 13:09:14 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!rip!news.webusenet.com!cox.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!news.airnews.net!cabal12.airnews.net!usenet
From: "John R. Strohm" <strohm@airmail.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Commercial license?
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:49:20 -0600
Organization: Airnews.net! at Internet America
Message-ID: 
 <ED8D401A6A707296.C382F71B9AEB882B.C5C9926651B6A00A@lp.airnews.net>
X-Orig-Message-ID: <b4dm0r$e34@library1.airnews.net>
References: <E18riJl-0007FK-00@porton.narod.ru>
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sat Mar  8 15:06:35 2003
NNTP-Posting-Host: !]X^91k-Y3p`snh (Encoded at Airnews!)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35078
Date: 2003-03-08T14:49:20-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Victor Porton" <porton@ex-code.com> wrote in message
news:E18riJl-0007FK-00@porton.narod.ru...
> I retell that am going to release UniParser as both GPL and XXX.
>
> Question: what commercial license XXX would be appropriate for
> a commercial Ada library distributed with source (forgotten
> redistribution, per developer or site license)? Well, forgotten
> redistribution of additional components of the commercial edition.
>
> Maybe for Ada software I need to say something special about
> reliability, not a typical "NO WARRANTY"? Well, now it is alpha.

Assuming that you mean "commercial" as in "I intend to make money off of
this", then the appropriate answer is "You should hire an attorney with
appropriate knowledge and experience and pay him money to write a license
that does what you want."  This is called "being in business".