From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,96ec22b0d62e8e73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Q Controlled Types
Date: 1997/06/07
Message-ID: <EBDs92.Fx2@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 246924852
References: <5n73uf$m1l@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>
 <199706061252.OAA22753@basement.replay.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <199706061252.OAA22753@basement.replay.com>,
Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM> wrote:
>On 5 Jun 1997 19:27:11 GMT, "Guido Schumacher"
><Guido.Schumacher@Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE> wrote:
>
>> Is there a possibility to distinguish two different kinds of situations
>> in which Finalize can be called from within the body of Finalize?
>> In other words, is it possible to treat the finalization of an object differently,
>> depending on the context in which it is performed?

I'm curious.  Why do you want to do this?

>In a word, "No."

Agreed.

>Should someone prove me wrong, I'd be interested to learn how to do
>this.

Not me.  It seems that Finalize doesn't know whether it's called from
assignment vs at end-of-procedure.

- Bob