From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6afaf3884e6e29ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Ed Falis" <falis@ma.aonix.com>
Subject: Re: win32ada with Object Ada
Date: 1997/06/05
Message-ID: <EBBq5J.2sr@thomsoft.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 246413681
Sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 192.157.137.14
References: 
 <Pine.LNX.3.95.970603155149.11503A-100000@crusher.et.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.0544.0
Organization: Aonix, San Diego, CA, USA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


There were some early problems compiling the binding, which I beleive were
related to the presence of 64 bit integer types.

These problems have been corrected in one of the compiler or the bindings,
and the current version works fine with the binding.  Since OA 7.0 was
released in September, two patches have been made available on our web site
(http://www.aonix.com/).

OA 7.1 for Windows is due to start shipping within a week or so.

Also note that the bindings are already precompiled in the product, and you
only need to add them to the project search list using the project.settings.
search tab.

- Ed

Ed Falis
Aonix
(617) 221-7341

Argue for your limitations ... and they're yours
- R. Bach
 Saif-Ali Butt wrote in article ...
>
>I have got Object Ada7 (Beta relaease) and Gnat 3.09 and both of the
>compilers are failed to compile win32ada bindings.  Object Ada does not
>recognize the project files available in the bindings.  However I opened
a
>new project and included some files in the project.  Both of the
compilers
>have problems with the code in winnt.ads. 
>
>If the code in winnt.ads really illegal, I ask, "How  could it be
compiled
>on Gnat 3.02 (as is mentioned in the readme file)?" Normally all the
>validated compilers should be able to compile a code or not to compile a
>code.  If some compilers can compile it and other not, then one cannot
>talk about compatibility of compilers.
>
>With best wishes
>
>Saif Ali Butt
>
>