From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Syntax for tagged record types (was Re: Not intended for use in
 medical,)
Date: 1997/05/22
Message-ID: <EALJpp.HnH@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 243141732
References: <3.0.32.19970423164855.00746db8@mail.4dcomm.com>
 <33828299.2A3@world.std.com> <mheaney-ya023680002005972314260001@news.ni.net
 <mheaney-ya023680002105972302430001@news.ni.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <mheaney-ya023680002105972302430001@news.ni.net>,
Matthew Heaney <mheaney@ni.net> wrote:
>I think that using discriminants as "constructor arguments" is a real
>kludge, and obfuscates declarations. ...

Why?

- Bob