From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0224dc3d1e52f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Ada-G, was Re: Streams and Concurrency Date: 1999/01/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 430368143 References: <76c3tv$acs@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <76cat4$2ldc$1@news.gate.net> <76dn7b$a35@bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net> <76fe92$46c$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <76g91o$udt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <368bdf3c.3097724@news.pacbell.net> <36962BBC.23B129F0@elca-matrix.ch> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-01-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <36962BBC.23B129F0@elca-matrix.ch> Mats Weber writes: > > They do, but the process is still slow and deliberate. During the > > (officially just over eleven years) between Ada 83 and Ada 95, there > > were a half-dozen cases where the Ada Rapporteur Group issued Nonbinding > > interpretations, one of them on raising Contstraint_Error instead of > > Program_Error. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > You mean Numeric_Error here, right ? Oops! You are right. (And I mispelled Constraint_Error too. I'll have to take my fingers in for a 50,000 message checkup.) However...Note that in going from Ada 83 to Ada 95, several cases where Constraint_Error or Program_Error error could be raised were tightened up. This is a good thing, but it may mean your code now raises Program_Error where before you saw Constraint_Error. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...