From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,184737148aef02ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Fixed point multiplication ambiguity
Date: 1999/01/14
Message-ID: <EACHUS.99Jan14140125@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 432634360
References: <369E14CA.90715966@lmco.com>
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-01-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <369E14CA.90715966@lmco.com> "Marc A. Criley" <marc.a.criley@lmco.com> writes:

  > I've studied the LRM 4.5.5(13-20), but who has the correct
  > interpretation doesn't quite jump out at me, though I am
  > leaning towards one over the other.

   I argee with GNAT that the code as written is illegal.  My guess is
that the other compiler is incorrectly applying 8.6(29) to the
addition of _universal_fixed_ and _root_real_.

--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...