From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d901a50a5adfec3c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,9f0bf354542633fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Fortran or Ada?
Date: 1998/09/25
Message-ID: <EACHUS.98Sep25155424@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 394841335
References: <6ue7kp$61k@boofura.swcp.com>
Followup-To: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <6ue7kp$61k@boofura.swcp.com> walt@swcp.com (Walt Brainerd) writes:

  > By Fortran, you must mean Fortran 77 because there are three
  > features in Fortran 90/95 that will cause this to be classified
  > as an error...

   Actually I believe it was FORTRAN IV or FORTRAN 66, but it could
even have been IBM FORTRAN II.  It would not have been FORTRAN G or H,
as 360s were not used for guidance until the 70s, and by then most
guidance was imbedded.
--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...