From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5d05ccde5cefb836 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Blocking protected ops (was: Tasks and C/C++ code) Date: 1998/11/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 415711831 References: <364702E5.F6987321@hiwaay.net> <729ndu$jfo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <72b35b$pll$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <87btm52jwl.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr> <3654746F.3C297E56@elca-matrix.ch> <87k90qunxl.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr> <36599BE3.BA30555B@elca-matrix.ch> <3659b3a8.386623@news.pacbell.net> <365AD980.5729FCD8@elca-matrix.ch> <365BE117.59209A5@elca-matrix.ch> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-11-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <365BE117.59209A5@elca-matrix.ch> Mats Weber writes: > I don't think so. Look closely at 9.5.1(16&18). Subprograms imported > with pragma Import are not covered. Eighteen only says that language-defined subprograms are not potentially blocking unless the RM says otherwise. Language-defined here is a technical term applying to subprograms defined by the Reference Manual. Sixteen is the key here. Within Ada, the RM can define what is a potentially blocking subprogram, outside the programmer has to figure it out for himself, which is why this is a bounded error. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...