From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,211e8255c3cfc45d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Bug story Date: 1998/07/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 376123766 References: <35AE4621.2EBC7F6A@eiffel.com> <7hAr1.3249$9E2.2188373@news.teleport.com> <35AF70B9.61C5BF88@oma.com> <35B32BDC.5C2C@dmu.ac.uk> <35B47EAD.3AA9@dmu.ac.uk> <35B60AC4.D703E836@hso.link.com> <6pcati$8l7$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <6pcati$8l7$1@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> fjh@cs.mu.oz.au (Fergus Henderson) writes: > The solution in Ada is basically the same as in C/C++, with slightly > different syntax: `pragma Volatile' rather than `volatile'. > Well, that's true in Ada 95, at least. I don't know off-hand > whether `pragma Volatile' was present in Ada 83. Perhaps someone > from comp.lang.ada can tell us. Most compilers provided it, but it was not a required pragma. Note that this is technically still the situation in Ada 95. Pragma Volitile is only required for compilers which support the Systems Programming Annex. (Of course, I can't imagine a serious Ada 95 compiler not supporting it, even if for some reason they don't support the entire SP Annex.) -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...