From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7fc767abbf17c947
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Parsing a line into strings
Date: 1998/07/15
Message-ID: <EACHUS.98Jul15162157@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 371796601
References: <35A3A199.D55C3153@oit.edu> <m3ogv0jm7b.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>
 <35A3AB67.9039CBA9@oit.edu> <35A40A94.6DB73E65@chat.ru>
 <Pine.BSF.3.96.980708161520.6018A-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <6o14rm$3nv@drn.newsguy.com> <dewar.899956473@merv>
 <35AB96E3.2338@watson.ibm.com>
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-07-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <35AB96E3.2338@watson.ibm.com> "Norman H. Cohen" <ncohen@watson.ibm.com> writes:

  > No_Implementation_Pragmas rules out implementation-defined pragmas, but
  > not implementation-defined arguments to language-defined pragmas.  For
  > that, GNAT would have to define

	   pragma Restrictions (No_Implementation_Pragma_Arguments);

   Shouldn't that be:

	   pragma Restrictions (No_Other_Implementation_Pragma_Arguments);

  ...or am i just being too literal minded? ;-)


--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...