From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2702c1ed8be62863 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best* Date: 1998/12/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 420191823 References: <366C0197.49B15B12@spam.innocon.com> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <366C0197.49B15B12@spam.innocon.com> Jeff Carter writes: > Why don't you read your Sunday paper, friend? Check out the want ads. MY > "statistical" survery tells me this: for every Ada job opening there are > literally - LITERALLY - dozens for Java and C++. What statistical > sampling do I need other than this? Let's see, I have worked with software engineers who didn't know Ada, and they were productive in Ada before they knew enough about the application to make serious changes to existing code. (Literally, I could take an Ada package spec and ask them to implement it, and any discussion would be about data-types, real-time constraints, etc.) On the other hand, it takes six to nine months to bring someone up to speed in C++, if you are lucky. So if I need an Ada software engineer, I'll talk about the application domain in the ad. If I need a C++ programmer, C++ will be a requirement. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...