From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3f74d676465455d2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Why a PROGRAM ERROR?
Date: 1998/12/14
Message-ID: <EACHUS.98Dec14120834@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 422162804
References: <3670178F.8751F9B9@nowhere.com> <m3yaofmpon.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <3671433E.79C04602@nowhere.com>
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-12-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3671433E.79C04602@nowhere.com> Rusnak <bogus@nowhere.com> writes:

 >         Any time I try to cast the anonymous access type to
 > My_Instance'Class to the type My_Class_Object_Type,
 >         a program error is raised.  Why is this the case, why is the
 > error not caught at compile time, and how can I resolve
 >        the error?  It seems to only occur  when a cast like this one is
 > made inside an instantiation of a generic package.

    Could it be a violation of accessability levels?  The kluge
example changes the accessability level of the value assigned.  (But I
would really have to see more of the code to see if this is the
problem, in particular, the declaration of Command_Object.)



--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...