From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b307bd75c8071241
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: newbie Q: storage management
Date: 1997/05/09
Message-ID: <EACHUS.97May9171032@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 240653942
References: <5k5hif$7r5@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <336A065B.41C6@magellan.bgm.link.com>
 <dewar.862662935@merv> <336E15A4.167E@magellan.bgm.link.com>
 <5knhge$mul@top.mitre.org> <dewar.863030172@merv>
Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



   Robert Dewar said:

  > P.S. There was for a while a language study group associated with
  > SIG Ada, whose purpose was to provide additional input to the
  > language design process. It never was very successful in that
  > goal, partly because a lot of the people involved did not have the
  > kind of depth of knowledge necessarily to put together coherent
  > proposals, but on the other hand, I think a lot of people found it
  > instructive and interesting.

   The one legacy I know of in Ada 95 from the ALIWG is the mechanism
for associating data with exception instances.  I think some other
ideas the originally surfaced in the ALIWG also made it in, but via
CIFO and the real-time working group so those ideas had, at the least,
mixed parentage.

--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...