From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/05/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 242010675 References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5k88f8$387@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5ku5tj$9d9$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes: > Developing a program with a really crappy user interface and then > telling the user that they should have read the manual when the > inevitable problems arise is a less than compelling excuse. What makes this a crappy user interface? The requirements may have specified that new submission erased old ones. This would allow a student to submit the current version and do additional checking during the subway ride home. If he finds something to fix, the earlier submission is ignored, otherwise he doesn't have to return to the lab the next day. I've even given take-home tests in this format, although there is it unusual for a student to use the option. However, I once had a student who handed in the test, then entered the hospital for gallstone removal. I suspect that the second paper--the other was returned unopened--was much better. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...