From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc65fe38e6751a89 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Aeonix Ada 95 Date: 1997/03/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 226210430 References: <857938743.26136@dejanews.com> <33237061.6A5D@bix.com> Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > This reminds me of a question that Phillipe Kruchten asked me, > back in his prerational days when he worked on the Ada-Ed project > at NYU. Hmmm... Phillipe wasn't rational when he was at NYU? ;-) > He asked if he could be validated as an Ada 83 compiler. He proposed to > look at each C test, think for a bit, and then say Passed! If he could pass the B-tests, I'd be willing to give him a certificate. (For those who have never dealt with the ACVC, the B-tests are--in 1.x--about 1000 test which not only require you to find every error at compile time, but to diagnose it correctly. Some tests have/had hundreds of errors. Every compiler vendor I know spent most of their effort during validation getting the B-tests right. Most of the rest was spent on C-tests, and A,D,E and L collectively accounted for at most 1-2% of the effort.) -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...