From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 115aec,f41f1f25333fa601 X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry Date: 1996/11/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 197918963 references: <55ea3g$m1j@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3280DA96.15FB@hso.link.com> organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.realtime Date: 1996-11-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3293C05E.7932@thomsoft.com> Dave Wood writes: > Yes, but to date Boeing and the airline industry have shown far > more interest in safe software than the backward automotive > industry. I suspect it will take a catastrophic and > widely-publicized failure (more to the point, one resulting in > large liability claims) before this industry decides to take steps > to protect their shareholders^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h customers from > "Level A" software failures. You are an optimist. There has already been one major incident like this (the Audi 5000), and one which is just developing (air-bags firing when they shouldn't). The belief is that the Audi 5000 cases were single point hardware failures, and the air-bag problem may turn out to be the same. But the automotive industry sees both as business as usual, no cause for alarm. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...