From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85ee038f08622eb8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus)
Subject: Re: Array Literals?
Date: 1996/08/14
Message-ID: <EACHUS.96Aug14182616@spectre.mitre.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 174221764
references: <4uo9b6$qj1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <4uq1jb$gpu@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <4uquru$jrq@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> cosc19z5@Bayou.UH.EDU (Spasmo) writes:

  > Yep.  Question though, what exactly is the difference between using
  > Int_Array' ( ), and Int_Array ( )?  I have used the latter before
  > to perform conversion with no apparent ill effect, but I believe
  > there is a difference, I just can't seem to recall it.

   Int_Array'(1,2,3,4,5) is a value of type Int_Array.
   Int_Array (1,2,3,4,5) won't work--assuming Int_Array is a type or
                         subtype name. 
   Int_Array (foo) converts foo to an Int_Array.
   Int_Array (Foo_Array'(1,2,3,4,5)) will convert the Foo_Array value
                 to an Int_Array.


--

					Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...