From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4961da398a273222 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-10 08:15:46 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!gw1.att.com!fnnews.fnal.gov!uwm.edu!news.alpha.net!news.mathworks.com!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!eff!blanket.mitre.org!linus.mitre.org!spectre!eachus From: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada self-referential operators Date: 10 Feb 1995 16:15:46 GMT Organization: The Mitre Corp., Bedford, MA. Message-ID: References: <3gnkjb$gso@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: spectre.mitre.org In-reply-to: pang@world.std.com's message of Fri, 10 Feb 1995 06:48:12 GMT Date: 1995-02-10T16:15:46+00:00 List-Id: In article pang@world.std.com writes: > the problem is the keyboard/ascii character set. it's not rich/expressive > enough! > what does it take to use symbol/graphics to represent operators and other > language constructs/elements? An APL keyboard of course. ;-) (Exit smiley mode.) APL has been called a "write only" language, and I tend to use it exactly that way. If I ever expect to need to be able to read the code (even the day I write it), I use Ada. This only emphasizes the point others have been making that lots of operator symbols may may code easier to write, but they certainly make it a LOT harder to read. -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...