From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 2 Aug 93 17:10:42 GMT From: eachus@mitre-bedford.arpa (Robert I. Eachus) Subject: Re: Are 'best' universities being targeted for Ada9X Message-ID: List-Id: In article srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes (lots of drivel deleted: > Also with little correlation with the competitive universities > is the universities ARPA and AJPO are funding with their > educational Ada grants, at least for the 1992 BAA: > East Tennessee State, Florida Agricultural, Illinois Institute, > Kutztown U., U. of Scranton, West Virgina U., U. of Alabama, > Central Mich.U., Clemson, Colorado State, U. of Conn., Univ. of > Dayton, Florida Inst. Tech., George Washington U., U. of Houston > - Clear Lake, U. of New Mexico, U. of North Dakota, RPI, > Shippensburg U., Southeastern Louisiana U., and Wright State > University. But there is a large correlation between this list and the list of well respected schools in the areas where Ada is heavily used. I could argue that RPI, where I got my Master's should be on the most competitive schools list, but it certainly is among the top ten engineering schools, as probably are Clemson and IIT. UHCL and FIT have close ties to NASA and are located near to major NASA facilities, etc. (I'll let Mike sing the praises of GWU if he feels it is necessary.) Yes, I would like to see CMU, MIT, or one of the Ivy League Schools on the list of schools using Ada. However, there is a problem with the mindset which says that top schools should educate students, not train them. RPI and WPI, on the other hand, prefer to have their graduates prepared for the "real world." -- Robert I. Eachus with Standard_Disclaimer; use Standard_Disclaimer; function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...