From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,baa6871d466e5af9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: AQ&S Guidance on pragma Elaborate_Body
Date: 1997/04/25
Message-ID: <E9716p.MK4@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237267359
References: <528878564wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk> <E95IKB.4Gx@world.std.com>
 <dewar.861936524@merv> <dewar.861936746@merv>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.861936746@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>I should say that the one class of dynamic checks that we do not know how
>to eliminate results from the use of access subprograms. Obviously this
>is a nasty case, since it involves dynamic value tracing, which cannot be
>done entirely accurately, even if you attempt it.

Presumably dispatching calls raise the same issue.

- Bob