From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e512734808cc6a49
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: [Q] GNAT Success stories?
Date: 1997/04/24
Message-ID: <E957Cp.4z6@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237109632
References: <5jm6qm$gem@news.ida.org>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5jm6qm$gem@news.ida.org>, Dan Lehman <lehman@ida.org> wrote:
>Bob Duff (obviously an Ada duffer) wrote (and I am NOT making this up!)
>
>> Well, I don't know how to configure my newsreader, either ...
>
>WHOA!
>Here, in light of recent revelations of incompetence at the FBI lab(s),
>which now send hope to many convicted by their *evidence*, Bob confesses
>to newsreader naivete'!
>Wow, imagine all the Approved Commentaries on which Bob voted that might
>now be called back by WG-9 for reconsideration.  And didn't Bob work on
>the Ada 95 standard, in the MRT?  --better re-review that as well, might
>turn out to be only Ada 94, or less (--been wondering about Section 13 :-).
>As it's well after April 1st, I am shocked.

:-)

Actually, I thought it *was* Ada 94.  The last dot of ink (or was it
toner?) dried on the official paper version in early December 1994.  ISO
took several months to make it official, though.  ;-)

- Bob