From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,baa6871d466e5af9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: AQ&S Guidance on pragma Elaborate_Body
Date: 1997/04/21
Message-ID: <E903q5.7uy@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 236396866
References: <528878564wnr@diphi.demon.co.uk>
 <mheaney-ya023680002104970117080001@news.ni.net> <E8znzn.DM2@world.std.com>
 <mheaney-ya023680002104970942110001@news.ni.net>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <mheaney-ya023680002104970942110001@news.ni.net>,
Matthew Heaney <mheaney@ni.net> wrote:
>OK, just so I understand this perfectly: If the generic package has used
>one of the pragmas Pure, Preelaborate, or Elaborate_Body, does that mean I
>the instantiator do not have to use pragma Elaborate_All?

Yes.

- Bob