From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,768ec7d79291ed2c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: IDENTIFIERS in Upper Case
Date: 1997/03/28
Message-ID: <E7rF6u.E3v@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 229022624
References: <1997Mar26.185431.12742@nosc.mil> <333AB9A0.7284@grammatech.com>
 <mheaney-ya023680002703971831260001@news.ni.net>
 <333BCDE9.176C@mlb.cca.rockwell.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <333BCDE9.176C@mlb.cca.rockwell.com>,
Jerry Petrey  <gdp@mlb.cca.rockwell.com> wrote:
>...Expecting the entire Ada (or any other language) 
>community to adhere to the same guidelines would be nice but not
>realistic

I believe the entire Smalltalk community adheres to the same case
conventions.

> - conformity within an organization is probably the best we can
>achieve.

- Bob